The advent of four-monthly exams at kingdom secondary faculties, like most things related to a public training system run utilizing unions and institutions, has degenerated into farce. This became glaring again on Wednesday when Education Minister Costas Hambiaouris informed the House education committee that four-month-to-month checks would be introduced during the new school year and that there could not be any other postponement.
The gadget, wherein students could sit down for tests twice a year instead of as soon as at the quiet of the year, became added from final September but changed into postponed due to pressure from political events, teaching unions, dad and mom’ associations, and the scholars’ enterprise. The government bowed to the stress in a spirit of compromise in the desire opposition might weaken a year later. However, it ought to have been acknowledged more.
However, objections were voiced at Wednesday’s committee assembly, led by the reactionary deputies of Akel. The committee said it would desk an invoice that might scrap the law for four-monthly exams at the grounds; there has been a need for a comprehensive gadget for evaluating college students, even though the minister had offered one. However, Akel’s major argument is that the minister ignored the perspectives of coaching unions, mothers and fathers, and college students.
In Cyprus’ wild world of consensus, anybody has a say in how the public schooling device should function, no matter how clueless they are. Are mother and father certified to determine how generally exams will be in a year? What academic reasoning do they base their competition on twice-yearly assessments that the ministry believes might encourage college students to observe more methodically instead of doing very little until the big last-year checks? The lunacy reaches its climax concerning teenage kids within the choice-making process; the representatives in their organization have been invited to the House and to meetings with the education minister to give their views as if they have valid perspectives. Predictably, they’re against twice-yearly assessments and announced they might “resist until the law is amended and those are scrapped.” Akel colleges the children in unionized behavior.
The only perspectives that could be considered are the teachers’ ones; however, could they be taken critically? Both think their priority is to do as little work as feasible. The competition should nicely be stimulated through the interest of their personal well-being rather than instructional concepts, which their unions do now not price enormously. The Ministry of Schooling has determined that 4-monthly exams will raise training requirements. The law for this change has been authorized, and the new machine must be delivered from the new school year. The change may not have the desired outcomes; however, we will not realize this until it is attempted for a few years. We know that public schooling fails mainly because coaching unions and parent associations have a huge say in how it works. This is why all this sterile debate needs to be prevented.
As with all the cards from the Rider-Waite tarot deck, this card is wealthy in symbolism. Some can be immediately associated with traditional religions- especially Christianity- and some symbols pre-date contemporary faiths. This card discusses traditions, conventions, and ideas, particularly structured training, organized religion, and Spirituality. It may be that someone is considering taking a path of established education. The Hierophant can come up as a trainer, guide, or mentor in some way. Maybe you are seeking steerage from someone else, or you’re the manual for any other man or woman. In the very best feel, that is someone who guides us to find our very own answers and to come to our answers, although in practice, it’s going to regularly be someone who is telling us what we ought to suppose and how we need to act and live our lives.
